Re: Bergger Versus Forte/ PMK testing.

From: Gregory W Blank ^lt;gblank@bellatlantic.net>
Date: 05/03/04-05:06:56 PM Z
Message-id: <BCBC48D0.44CF%gblank@bellatlantic.net>

I should clarify to what I referred.

Just about every roll of B&W and color negative film I have ever scanned
exhibits this to some degree, however Forte roll films especially those
developed in PMK make it apparently worse. Something like white dust,
artifacts? Scanner is a 2450. The surface imperfections in traditional
printing methods never show up.

on 5/3/04 6:40 PM, Sandy King at sanking@clemson.edu wrote:

> Gregory,
>
> From my discussions of various films on other forums I think this is
> a quality control issue. Quality control may also be an issue with
> the films made in Croatia, such as Efke PL 25 and PL 100, but Efke PL
> 100 is otherwise just an outstanding film for alternative printing.
>
> As for the specific surface imperfections you describe, I don't
> believe I have hear them mentioned before.
>
> Sandy

>
Received on Mon May 3 17:08:40 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 06/04/04-01:20:52 PM Z CST