Re: EPSON 4870 PRO versus Microtek i900 (Was Re: modifying scanner)

From: Gregory Blank ^lt;gregoryblank@verizon.net>
Date: 11/17/04-03:59:52 PM Z
Message-id: <02718374-38E4-11D9-8B86-000393675BB0@verizon.net>

Problem is I've received two defective units in a row, and I don't have
the clout of a university
to back me up.

On Nov 17, 2004, at 4:50 PM, BKPhoto@aol.com wrote:

> We have been using Microtek flatbed scanners in our digital labs for
> the past five years. We currently have a ScanMaker 9800 XL and two
> ArtixScan 1800f's that see constant student use. They are, in their
> price range, excellent machines. We've also enjoyed excellent
> technical support from Microtek.
>
>
>
> Bill Kennedy
> Associate Professor of Photocommunications
> St. Edward's University
> 512/448-8680
Received on Wed Nov 17 15:57:40 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/08/04-10:51:33 AM Z CST