Re: Re Palladium vs. Gold Chloride toning

From: Ryuji Suzuki ^lt;rs@silvergrain.org>
Date: 11/30/04-05:21:52 PM Z
Message-id: <20041130.182152.71877094.lifebook-4234377@silvergrain.org>

From: Sandy King <sanking@clemson.edu>
Subject: Re: Re Palladium vs. Gold Chloride toning
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:37:08 -0500

> I am not sure what this article means. Are you quoting an old source,
> or claiming that in 2004 it is less expensive to tone with palladium
> than with gold?

That article is talking about histological treatment of brainstem
specimen, where neurons of interest are impregnated with silver. While
chemical basis is apparently in common to photographic processing, I
would not take what's stated in the abstract to apply in darkroom
unless retested in photographic condition.

--
Ryuji Suzuki
"People seldom do what they believe in.  They do what is convenient,
then repent." (Bob Dylan, Brownsville Girl, 1986)
Received on Tue Nov 30 17:21:57 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/08/04-10:51:34 AM Z CST