RE: copyright

So did you take care of the "problem" by paying the fee or did you use the
"studio set up" for free?

Eric Neilsen Photography

4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

214-827-8301

http://ericneilsenphotography.com

  _____

From: Jim Strain [mailto:jstrain@iquest.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 4:13 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: copyright

Encountered the same sort of thing attempting to photograph certain
exteriors of well known London sites such as the Tower of London and the
Tower Bridge. The tripod is a tipoff that a person making a photograph
might be more serious than the average bloke.

Have run into problems around our nation's capitol as well - mostly in the
Capitol Hill area. There the issue may be less protection of the franchise
and more security. Jim

----- Original Message -----

From: Ender100@aol.com

To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 1:05 PM

Subject: Re: copyright

nothing....I just took photographs ;)

In a message dated 3/31/05 5:13:23 AM, bkleider@sihope.com writes:

And? Don't leave us hanging! What did you say?

Barry

Ender100@aol.com wrote:

I ran into a similar situation a few years ago at Torrey Pines State Park in
California. The Park Ranger noticed all the camera equipment in my car and
told me that the State/Park retains the "copryright" on the trees there
(they only grow in this one tiny coastal area of California) and that
photographers are not allowed to take photographs of them for any type of
commercial work, including art work they would sell without paying a
licensing fee.

Mark Nelson
Precision Digital Negatives <http://www.precisiondigitalnegatives.com/>

Mark Nelson
Precision Digital Negatives <http://www.precisiondigitalnegatives.com/>
Received on Mon Apr 4 08:23:34 2005