Re: Restoration of the tri-color camera. An update.

Katharine Thayer wrote:
>
> Michael Briggs wrote:
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>
> > Sent: Mar 20, 2005 2:49 AM
> > To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> > Subject: Re: Restoration of the tri-color camera. An update.
> At no
> > point do I see any reference to prints being made from these images, but
> > perhaps I'm just missing something obvious. (It wouldn't be the first
> > time).
> >
> > on the method is unclear on this, but prints and web images were made at the same time.
>
> Thanks, Michael for clarification. But that begs another question: how
> were the prints made? Since the website page about re-creating the
> images says nothing about how the prints were made, can we assume the
> prints are digital prints made from the composite images?

And it seems reasonable also to assume that the web images are not scans
of prints, but are simply the composite RGB images?
kt
Received on Mon Mar 21 09:37:39 2005