Re: Harmon's Ternary Method

From: Clay ^lt;wcharmon@wt.net>
Date: 09/13/05-04:34:12 AM Z
Message-id: <B6F578C1-9468-45B6-9F96-F233326A69B4@wt.net>

> Just to clarify that should read B:1 should it not?
>
Yes, sorry about the typo.
Received on Tue Sep 13 04:34:32 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: George L Smyth: "RE: Fixing Lumin Prints"
Previous message: Kerik: "RE: "speckling" v "staining ""
In reply to: Michael Koch-Schulte: "Re: Harmon's Ternary Method"
Next in thread: Michael Koch-Schulte: "Re: Harmon's Ternary Method"
Reply: Michael Koch-Schulte: "Re: Harmon's Ternary Method"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 10/18/05-01:13:01 PM Z CST