Re: Need Advice on Thick Gum Coating

From: Marek Matusz ^lt;marekmatusz@hotmail.com>
Date: 04/06/06-11:20:39 AM Z
Message-id: <BAY101-F39FBC649606B4D25C5A3B6BBC80@phx.gbl>

Katharine,
I use brush to spread the mix quickly and then dry, or almost dry foam
roller to smmoth the coat. I use foam roller that Clay has suggested a while
back. If you get too much gum on your roller then it is difficult to smooth
out even. If you keep overworking it you weill get unven coating as well. It
is not difficult after some practice.
As far as the exposure through the back of the glass, a colimated light
source is required, so that the image is not blurred out. I do not have one,
sun exposure is my option. I have not printed in the sun in ages.
Marek

>From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>
>Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
>To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
>Subject: Re: Need Advice on Thick Gum Coating
>Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 08:44:08 -0700
>
>
>On Apr 6, 2006, at 6:31 AM, Marek Matusz wrote:
>
>>Sandy,
>>Try a foam roller for smoothing your gum. it works for a lot of people on
>>this list, including myself.
>
>Marek, how do you keep from getting a pebbly texture in the gum? Am I just
>not using a light enough touch, or what?
>
>>I like your idea of exposing the print from the back. Glass would be good
>>testing surface. Maybe if the gum is exposed through the glass it will
>>not wash off.
>
>I think this may be a good test of the idea, and I hope you'll report your
>results. I'll try it too when I get back. But one thing that gives me
>pause about exposing an image on glass from the back, is that you're going
>to have the thickness of the glass between the negative and the emulsion.
>It might be an interesting effect, but won't be the same as having the
>negative in contact with the emulsion.
>
>Katharine
Received on Thu Apr 6 11:20:56 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/01/06-11:10:24 AM Z CST