Dan,
Sorry for the confusion. I meant "tests," not "testes."
But you sure have me intrigued. Which chart did you have tattooed on
"your very special parts"? AF 1951 I hope! And what is the threshold
of resolution when the parts are in the optimized position?
Also, any color in that tattoo?
Sandy
>Sandy King wrote on 4/22/06, 11:33 AM:
>
>>I personally do not believe that resolution greater than 20-25 lppm can
>> be the cause of the greater sharpness apparently observed in the
>> testes to which Gregory refers.
>
>Ahem, did you mean "the tests" in the sentence above? Now you got me
>wondering about the resolution chart I had tattooed on my special parts.
>
>Dan
>--
><http://www.DanBurkholder.com>www.DanBurkholder.com
><http://www.TinyTutorials.com>www.TinyTutorials.com
Received on Sat Apr 22 21:41:43 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/01/06-11:10:26 AM Z CST