RE: Glyoxal?

From: Eric Neilsen ^lt;e.neilsen@worldnet.att.net>
Date: 01/14/06-10:52:19 PM Z
Message-id: <003401c6198f$77d085d0$51a0fea9@NEWDELL>

What did you do Katharine?

Eric Neilsen Photography
4101 Commerce Street
Suite 9
Dallas, TX 75226
http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
http://ericneilsenphotography.com
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryuji Suzuki [mailto:rs@silvergrain.org]
> Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 5:07 PM
> To: alt-photo list
> Subject: Re: Glyoxal?
>
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:25:46 -0800, "Katharine Thayer"
> <kthayer@pacifier.com> said:
>
> > I believe you, but after my frightful experience, you couldn't drag
> > me near the stuff again.
>
> But then you were doing exactly what I said, repeatedly, to be dangeous.
> What am I supposed to say.
>
> Also, considering comparable toxicity of the two agents, it lacks logic
> to assume that glyoxal to be safer than glut, even in 30x quantity and
> 15x concentration.
Received on Sat Jan 14 22:52:18 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/14/06-10:55:39 AM Z CST