On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Christina Z. Anderson wrote:
> What I find illogical is the acceptance of the validity of many different
> ways of arriving at an end product EXCEPT the acceptance of a standardized
> method. Why should that one way be unacceptable/inappropriate? It simply is
> not true, in my experience. Unnecessary?--if your gum prints are gorgeous,
> why would you need to change your practice anyway? If your gum practice
> leaves something to be desired in your prints (which is true of more than a
> few gummists), then this is ONE avenue you may want to explore.
Chris, if you're interpreting my next to last to mean I meant that, I
didn't. I meant that it's not essential, and may be limiting. Tho
obviously it can be a great convenience, freeing the mind for other
exploits. I suspect however that modifications will then come, if not from
print to print, then over time.
J.
Received on 07/18/06-01:26:22 PM Z
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 08/31/06-12:23:48 PM Z CST