RE: Gums a la Demachy and Puyo and all sorts of other things including cyanot...

From: Loris Medici <mail_at_loris.medici.name>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:08:01 +0300
Message-id: <20060719130810.0988B76E57@spamf4.usask.ca>

Won't take the trouble, write your own version - If you really tried new
cyanotype that is. If you haven't tried it, then try it before wasting our
time...
 
I wonder if I do anything not over-complicated-to-you in my life. Let me
think... sleeping, going to the bathroom in the morning... perhaps. (I'm
sure you posses the ability to find something over-complicated even in these
very standard human behaviours.)
 
Loris.

________________________________

From: TERRYAKING@aol.com [mailto:TERRYAKING@aol.com]
Sent: 19 Temmuz 2006 Çarşamba 15:47
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Gums a la Demachy and Puyo and all sorts of other things
including cyanot...

Loris

I was not kidding,

Your explanation is deliberately over complicated to make it difficult to
make a comparison..

If you want to have any credibility set out side by side,in two columns, as
simply as you can, which chemicals are needed for each process. leaving out
all the MW stuff about the instability of FAC ( in thirty years the stuff
has never given me a problem) as it is irrelevant. Say what the compounds
are, none of this 'necessary compounds'.

Then explain. again very simply, what you need to do to make up the
chemicals and coat the paper.
That way we will be able to make a comparison.

Terry
Received on 07/19/06-07:08:18 AM Z

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 08/31/06-12:23:48 PM Z CST