It looks like nabble.com is more or less 'hijacking' listarchives and
presenting them on their site without permission. This was also
mentioned on the quicktime-vr list today. That list is 'nabbled' too.
The nabble.com faq says that listmanagers can ask for removal but they
see themselves as a google like service claiming the right to 'archive
the web'.
-kees
On 27-jun-06, at 10:30, TERRYAKING@aol.com wrote:
>
>
> I was told yesterday morning that there were many references on
> Google to cyanotype rex. I checked them out.
>
> I suppose that one has to accept that people will presume to know
> things of which they have no knowledge and that some will even parade
> this ignorance. There were references to people making amendments to
> the ph of ferric nitrate which play no part in the process and
> another to the acidity of ferric ammonium citrate which also has
> nothing to do with it.
>
> There was also a full repetition of the 'spoiling' correspondence on
> 'motives' from this list on something called 'Nabble' . What is
> 'Nabble' and why was this correspondence there ?
>
> The genuine article is at
>
> http://www.hands-on-pictures.com/html/rexhow.html
>
> Terry
>
>
>
Received on 06/27/06-11:56:01 AM Z
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 07/28/06-08:55:14 AM Z CST