Fwd: Inkjet printer (large format)?

From: Ender100@aol.com
Date: 03/01/06-02:54:53 PM Z
Message-id: <235.7c2698e.3137641d@aol.com>

Mark I. Nelson
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
www.PrecisionDigitalNegatives.com
PDNPrint Forum @ Yahoo Groups

Return-path: <Ender100@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 15:48:20 EST
From: Ender100@aol.com
Subject: Re: Inkjet printer (large format)?
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Message-id: <240.7cadf09.31376294@aol.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Thunderbird - Mac OS X sub 208
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Boundary_(ID_c2NVKcT8P6UE9LNkGpXsCg)"
Full-name: Ender100

--Boundary_(ID_c2NVKcT8P6UE9LNkGpXsCg)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-language: en
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Yves,

I think quite a few people use the 13 x 19 printers since they are designed=20
as the higher end desktop printers for photographs=E2=80=94so they give bett=
er output=20
and tend to make better negatives.

I have not tested any printers other than Epson. This is partially due to=20
early reports that the inks used by other companies did not have much densit=
y=20
for digital negatives. That may have changed=E2=80=94perhaps others could=20=
comment on=20
that.

Mark I. Nelson
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
www.PrecisionDigitalNegatives.com
PDNPrint Forum @ Yahoo Groups

In a message dated 3/1/06 2:33:51 PM, gauvreau-yves@sympatico.ca writes:

> Hi,
>=20
> I wonder if any of you as used a HP 13"x19" inkjet printer to make negativ=
e
> with excellent result even in the long run? Or any recommendation on other=
s
> except Epson.
>=20
> Thanks
> Yves
>=20

--Boundary_(ID_c2NVKcT8P6UE9LNkGpXsCg)
Content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-language: en
Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE

<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><HTML><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=
=3D"Geneva" FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" SIZE=3D"2">Hi Yves,<BR>
<BR>
I think quite a few people use the 13 x 19 printers since they are de=
signed as the higher end desktop printers for photographs=E2=80=94so =
they give better output and tend to make better negatives.<BR>
<BR>
I have not tested any printers other than Epson.&nbsp; This is parti=
ally due to early reports that the inks used by other companies did n=
ot have much density for digital negatives.&nbsp; That may have chan=
ged=E2=80=94perhaps others could comment on that.<BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Geneva" FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" S=
IZE=3D"2">Mark I. Nelson<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#B0B0B0" FACE=3D"Geneva" FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" S=
IZE=3D"2">www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com<BR>
www.PrecisionDigitalNegatives.com<BR>
PDNPrint Forum @ Yahoo Groups</FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"G=
eneva" FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" SIZE=3D"2"><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
In a message dated 3/1/06 2:33:51 PM, gauvreau-yves@sympatico.ca writ=
es:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE CITE STYLE=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT=
: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px" TYPE=3D"CITE"></FONT><FO=
NT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Geneva" FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" SIZE=3D"2">=
Hi,<BR>
<BR>
I wonder if any of you as used a HP 13"x19" inkjet printer to make ne=
gative<BR>
with excellent result even in the long run? Or any recommendation on =
others<BR>
except Epson.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks<BR>
Yves<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Geneva" FAMILY=
=3D"SANSSERIF" SIZE=3D"2"><BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Geneva" FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" S=
IZE=3D"2"><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Geneva" FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" S=
IZE=3D"2"><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Geneva" FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" S=
IZE=3D"2"></FONT></HTML>

--Boundary_(ID_c2NVKcT8P6UE9LNkGpXsCg)--
Received on Wed Mar 1 14:56:23 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 04/10/06-09:43:46 AM Z CST