March 2006 Alt-Photo-Process-L: Fwd: Inkjet printer (large forma

From: Ender100@aol.com
Date: 03/01/06-02:54:53 PM Z
Message-id: <235.7c2698e.3137641d@aol.com>

Mark I. Nelson
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
www.PrecisionDigitalNegatives.com
PDNPrint Forum @ Yahoo Groups

Return-path: <Ender100@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 15:48:20 EST
From: Ender100@aol.com
Subject: Re: Inkjet printer (large format)?
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Message-id: <240.7cadf09.31376294@aol.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Thunderbird - Mac OS X sub 208
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_c2NVKcT8P6UE9LNkGpXsCg)"
Full-name: Ender100

--Boundary_(ID_c2NVKcT8P6UE9LNkGpXsCg)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-language: en
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Yves,

I think quite a few people use the 13 x 19 printers since they are designed=20
as the higher end desktop printers for photographs=E2=80=94so they give bett=
er output=20
and tend to make better negatives.

I have not tested any printers other than Epson. This is partially due to=20
early reports that the inks used by other companies did not have much densit=
y=20
for digital negatives. That may have changed=E2=80=94perhaps others could=20=
comment on=20
that.

Mark I. Nelson
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
www.PrecisionDigitalNegatives.com
PDNPrint Forum @ Yahoo Groups

In a message dated 3/1/06 2:33:51 PM, gauvreau-yves@sympatico.ca writes:

> Hi,
>=20
> I wonder if any of you as used a HP 13"x19" inkjet printer to make negativ=
e
> with excellent result even in the long run? Or any recommendation on other=
s
> except Epson.
>=20
> Thanks
> Yves
>=20

--Boundary_(ID_c2NVKcT8P6UE9LNkGpXsCg)
Content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-language: en
Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE

<HTML><HTML>Hi Yves, 
 
I think quite a few people use the 13 x 19 printers since they are de=
signed as the higher end desktop printers for photographs=E2=80=94so =
they give better output and tend to make better negatives. 
 
I have not tested any printers other than Epson.  This is parti=
ally due to early reports that the inks used by other companies did n=
ot have much density for digital negatives.  That may have chan=
ged=E2=80=94perhaps others could comment on that. 
 
Mark I. Nelson 
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com 
www.PrecisionDigitalNegatives.com 
PDNPrint Forum @ Yahoo Groups 
 
 
In a message dated 3/1/06 2:33:51 PM, gauvreau-yves@sympatico.ca writ=
es: 
 
 
<BLOCKQUOTE CITE STYLE=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT=
: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px" TYPE=3D"CITE"><FO=
NT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Geneva" FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" SIZE=3D"2">=
Hi, 
 
I wonder if any of you as used a HP 13"x19" inkjet printer to make ne=
gative 
with excellent result even in the long run? Or any recommendation on =
others 
except Epson. 
 
Thanks 
Yves 
</BLOCKQUOTE> 
 
 
 
 
 
 
</HTML>

--Boundary_(ID_c2NVKcT8P6UE9LNkGpXsCg)--
Received on Wed Mar 1 14:56:23 2006

Fwd: Inkjet printer (large format)?