March 2006 Alt-Photo-Process-L: RE: old UV tubes less contrast?

From: Loris Medici ^lt;mail@loris.medici.name>
Date: 03/03/06-04:55:50 AM Z
Message-id: <004401c63eb1$0a617350$f402500a@altinyildiz.boyner>

See a couple of my Vandykes (these are pretty old - I don't to Vandykes
anymore; switched to Ziatype - much more convenient and easy).

http://gallery.photo.net/photo/2056041-lg.jpg (Gold toned, double
coated)
http://gallery.photo.net/photo/2025416-lg.jpg (Untoned, double coated)
http://gallery.photo.net/photo/2012642-lg.jpg (Untoned, double coated)

Scans match the prints closely (on gamma 2.2 calibrated monitors).

Regards,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Loris Medici [mailto:mail@loris.medici.name]
Sent: 03 Mart 2006 Cuma 12:49
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: RE: old UV tubes less contrast?

A clarification:
This is for reflective reading BTW (in order to design the process
adjustment curve), not transmissive reading.

-----Original Message-----
From: Loris Medici [mailto:mail@loris.medici.name]
Sent: 03 Mart 2006 Cuma 12:38
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: RE: old UV tubes less contrast?

...
(I measure densities using a scanner - as described in Mark's book) ...
Received on Fri Mar 3 04:50:10 2006