In a message dated 4/5/06 2:28:40 pm, gauvreau-yves@sympatico.ca writes:
>
> Terry,
>
>
>
> you say below "I prefer to get my negatives right frst and not use tone
> controls. To my eye this produces a better print.", I think I understand why you
> say this and here I assume you are talking digital, to make it as short as
> possible I would sayf you are not using the proper methods or techniques to
> work out things in the numerical world things can and will degrade fairly ra
> ipidely. I'm not saying you have poor working methods, I'm just trying to find
> possible explanations to why you say such a thing. There are other possible
> explanations of course.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Yves
>
>
>
>
>
>
Yves
No, as I use film negatives. FP4 rated at 32 ISO, your assumption does not
apply.
Evenso, when you say "If you are not using the proper methods or techniques
to work out things in the numerical world things can and will degrade fairly
rapidely", which 'things' will degrade and in what way ?
Terry
Terry King FRPS
RPS Historical Group (Chairman)
www.hands-on-pictures.com/
Moderated Discussion Group
Post message: artaltphot@yahoogroups.co.uk
Subscribe: artaltphot-subscribe@yahoogroups.co.uk
Unsubscribe: artaltphot-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.co.uk
1. An excellent thing is as rare as it is difficult.(Spinoza)
2. A man's reach should be beyond his grasp or what's a heaven for.(Browning)
3. Frustra fit per plura quod potest fieri per pauciora.(Occam's razor or
'Keep it simple!').
4. Nullius in Verba (Horace), 'Take no man's word for it' (motto of the
Royal Society).
5. If ignorance is bliss, why are not more people happy ? (anon)
Received on 05/04/06-09:44:09 AM Z
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 06/23/06-10:10:53 AM Z CST