The word "scrutiny" above should be replaced with "observation from a
distance". What has been published about the process so far, to my
knowledge, might as well be re-titled:
"The art of saying nothing about a photographic process, in 2,000 well
chosen words";-)
>
>I am naturally reluctant, as an iron man, to be re-cast in the mould of an
>advocate for photopolymeric persons.
>
>My message -to members concerned about dichromate toxicity- was simply
>this: there seems now to be a safer alternative.
To this effect, I am anxious to know what the solvent is.
>The process and kit is, I believe, going to be reviewed in the E-zine
>'Photon' next month, so you'll all be able to read about it there.
>
>BTW Luis, its 399 - I don't get the AP either (8-(
>
>Mike