RE: "I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail"
- To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
- Subject: RE: "I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail"
- From: Robert Peterson <petersonrbrt@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
- Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;b=QSrdhFzBRCtRpNBtHxfEXqkvrlY9IsiTfHp0AbyY48iB8iegxqHdLY6T/ZAUfiCmRl85uUCajj1x1bhBhBXIg/5C0lIYvtLgIkoAftmh8FmYI1MsvlOBIz7VT/ylPIZWfnQpc5VDuKGc3IaKcNicm7KtT2f17XLSrnPNwqYU9s8= ;
- In-reply-to: <009101c6c8c6$4bef1f80$51a0fea9@NEWDELL>
- List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
- Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Ditto. I think you should suspend the address. I don't see why anyone thinks that everyone on the list should respond to them. There are other solutions to spam. This one doesn't work for lists. Bob Peterson
Eric Neilsen <e.neilsen@worldnet.att.net> wrote: I too got one sent direct to me. I have no plan to respond.
Gord, perhaps, can just suspend the offending email address?
Eric Neilsen Photography
4101 Commerce Street
Suite 9
Dallas, TX 75226
http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
http://ericneilsenphotography.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Knoppow [mailto:dickburk@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 9:55 PM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> Subject: Re: "I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail"
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Judy Seigel"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 11:15 AM
> Subject: "I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail"
>
>
> >
> > Today I receved a 17 K message including 6 or 8 "gif"
> > files, whatever they
>
> O.K., I just got a similar message. It was sent by the
> Spamarrest site, which appears to be legitimate. It is
> responding to a message I sent to this list rather than to
> the subscriber to the spam blocker. The GIF images are their
> trade marks, etc, all sent HTML, generally a no-no for
> e-mail. I am not responding to it because I sent no message
> to this person. I think it is a bug in the Spamarrest's
> software. Perhaps it is responding to the same thing that
> blocks my own messages as returned by the list. The
>
interesting thing is that it was sent directly to me and not
> forwarded by the list. I can now understand why you were
> annoyed by this and appologize for taking you to task.
> However, I doubt if the spam blocker service subscriber,
> whoever he is, knows its doing this. Heigh-Ho, locking out
> the bad guys also locks out your friends.
>
> ---
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@ix.netcom.com
|