RE: "I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail"
I too got one sent direct to me. I have no plan to respond. Gord, perhaps, can just suspend the offending email address? Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 http://e.neilsen.home.att.net http://ericneilsenphotography.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Knoppow [mailto:dickburk@ix.netcom.com] > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 9:55 PM > To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca > Subject: Re: "I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail" > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Judy Seigel" <jseigel@panix.com> > To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca> > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 11:15 AM > Subject: "I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail" > > > > > > Today I receved a 17 K message including 6 or 8 "gif" > > files, whatever they > > O.K., I just got a similar message. It was sent by the > Spamarrest site, which appears to be legitimate. It is > responding to a message I sent to this list rather than to > the subscriber to the spam blocker. The GIF images are their > trade marks, etc, all sent HTML, generally a no-no for > e-mail. I am not responding to it because I sent no message > to this person. I think it is a bug in the Spamarrest's > software. Perhaps it is responding to the same thing that > blocks my own messages as returned by the list. The > interesting thing is that it was sent directly to me and not > forwarded by the list. I can now understand why you were > annoyed by this and appologize for taking you to task. > However, I doubt if the spam blocker service subscriber, > whoever he is, knows its doing this. Heigh-Ho, locking out > the bad guys also locks out your friends. > > --- > Richard Knoppow > Los Angeles, CA, USA > dickburk@ix.netcom.com
|