RE: "I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail"
I too got one sent direct to me. I have no plan to respond.
Gord, perhaps, can just suspend the offending email address?
Eric Neilsen Photography
4101 Commerce Street
Dallas, TX 75226
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Knoppow [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 9:55 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: "I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail"
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Judy Seigel" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: <email@example.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 11:15 AM
> Subject: "I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail"
> > Today I receved a 17 K message including 6 or 8 "gif"
> > files, whatever they
> O.K., I just got a similar message. It was sent by the
> Spamarrest site, which appears to be legitimate. It is
> responding to a message I sent to this list rather than to
> the subscriber to the spam blocker. The GIF images are their
> trade marks, etc, all sent HTML, generally a no-no for
> e-mail. I am not responding to it because I sent no message
> to this person. I think it is a bug in the Spamarrest's
> software. Perhaps it is responding to the same thing that
> blocks my own messages as returned by the list. The
> interesting thing is that it was sent directly to me and not
> forwarded by the list. I can now understand why you were
> annoyed by this and appologize for taking you to task.
> However, I doubt if the spam blocker service subscriber,
> whoever he is, knows its doing this. Heigh-Ho, locking out
> the bad guys also locks out your friends.
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles, CA, USA