Re: The "Offender" replies....
Hey John, I got one of the emails, but it didn't bother me; I didn't even notice there were any gifs attached. I replied to the email and it was done, actually much more quickly than if I had started a flame thread against you. I actually hate flame threads MUCH more than I dislike automatic anti-spam emails (and I do acknowledge that this is an anti-flame flame email). People expend so much effort condemning you that they end up being far worse. Come on, calling for you to be kicked off the list for a simple message? Or resending the offending message to the entire list?? How is that not 100x as annoying? Lighten up, guys. Peace, Brad John Edwards wrote: > SORRY! > I most humbly apologize for causing such a turmoil on this list, which I have belonged to since about 1998(?). > I have used SpamArrest for prob 6 months, and have had some success with it, decreasing my spam by probably 80%. > They seem to be a fairly new company. > This list, I admit, has been filtered off to a subdirectory by me, mostly because I tired of wading through endless squabbles and fully-copied messages. > Unfortunately, I don't have time to check and read every day - usually only checking my email weekly. > That being said, I do value the info you put forth on alt processes, and hope to get myself out of neutral and back into the darkroom. > Thanks to Richard Knoppow for "getting it". > I have placed this list on "approved" status, which I sincerely hope will solve the problem. > Once again, I apologize. > - John F. Edwards, Vancouver, WA (edw4@mindspring.com) > >
|