U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: The "Offender" replies....

Re: The "Offender" replies....

Hey John,

I got one of the emails, but it didn't bother me; I didn't even notice there
were any gifs attached.  I replied to the email and it was done, actually much
more quickly than if I had started a flame thread against you.  I actually hate
flame threads MUCH more than I dislike automatic anti-spam emails (and I do
acknowledge that this is an anti-flame flame email).  People expend so much
effort condemning you that they end up being far worse.  Come on, calling for
you to be kicked off the list for a simple message?  Or resending the offending
message to the entire list??  How is that not 100x as annoying?

Lighten up, guys.



John Edwards wrote:
> I most humbly apologize for causing such a turmoil on this list, which I have
belonged to since about 1998(?).
> I have used SpamArrest for prob 6 months, and have had some success with it,
decreasing my spam by probably 80%.
> They seem to be a fairly new company.
> This list, I admit, has been filtered off to a subdirectory by me, mostly
because I tired of wading through endless squabbles and fully-copied messages.
> Unfortunately, I don't have time to check and read every day - usually only
checking my email weekly.
> That being said, I do value the info you put forth on alt processes, and hope
to get myself out of neutral and back into the darkroom.
> Thanks to Richard Knoppow for "getting it".
> I have placed this list on "approved" status, which I sincerely hope will
solve the problem.
> Once again, I apologize.
>   - John F. Edwards, Vancouver, WA (edw4@mindspring.com)