RE: pt/pd mounting
No worries...I thought 1.2 was a little high hehe. Camden Hardy camden[at]hardyphotography[dot]net http://www.hardyphotography.net On Mon, September 11, 2006 5:17 pm, Loris Medici wrote: > Oops! I noticed that I've made a mistake: > > My statement about density gain should be: "you'll gain log 0.3 - 0.4 > additional density in the darkest tones"... > > Regards, > Loris. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Camden Hardy [mailto:camden@hardyphotography.net] > Sent: 12 Eylül 2006 Salı 02:12 > To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca > Subject: RE: pt/pd mounting > > I definitely wasn't going to wait; in fact, I'm on my way to buy some in a > few minutes. > > But I am still very interested in the archival qualities of polyurethane, > i.e. whether sealing off the print does in fact prevent exposure to acid. > I'd love to hear some comprehensive test results sometime. > > Camden Hardy > > camden[at]hardyphotography[dot]net > http://www.hardyphotography.net > > > On Mon, September 11, 2006 4:53 pm, Loris Medici wrote: >> I think you should try it without waiting results from any test; >> because I can assure you that you'll gain around log 0.9 - 1.2 >> additional density in the darkest tones! (Nothing comes without a >> price; which is loosing the nice matte finish in this case). >> >> Regards, >> Loris. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Camden Hardy [mailto:camden@hardyphotography.net] >> Sent: 12 Eylül 2006 Salý 01:41 >> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca >> Subject: RE: pt/pd mounting >> >> ... >> >> Loris, your polyurethane comment intrigued me. This could add a very >> nice aesthetic effect to the series in question, so I may have to give >> it a try. >> I would be very interested to hear the results of your tests if/when >> you and Ryuji get around to it. Keep me posted! >> >> ... >> >> > > > > > >
|