U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | RE: Van Dyke and Kallitype

RE: Van Dyke and Kallitype

Ok Sandy,

Thanks. I see in the archives that yiu did some experimentation with longevity of toned VDB's. Did you come to any conclusons?

David H 


On Sep 21 2006, Sandy King wrote:

I put Argyrotype in the same class with VDB. Untoned Argyrotypes are
probably more permanent that VDBs. However, for maximum archival
qualities there is no question but tht Argyrotypes should be toned
like VDBs and kallitypes.

Visually untoned Argyrotypes look like untoned VDBs to me so they
rate the same here. Also, like VDB there is very little, if any,
contrast control.

Process wise Argyrotype is much more paper sensitive than VDB and
kallitype. Many papers that work well with VDB and kallitype don't
work well with Argyrotype, and many that do work well are quite


>Hi Sandy et al,
>How would you rate the newcomer to the family, Argyrotype?
>David H