U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: Contact versus In-camera Exposure Times

Re: Contact versus In-camera Exposure Times



And a parody of Kodak XTOL developer will be named Silvergrain REXTOL
(TM).

On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:30:33 -0500, "Clay" <wcharmon@wt.net> said:
> Stand by. My new 'Train Rex' process is almost complete.
> On Sep 25, 2006, at 8:53 PM, Ender100@aol.com wrote:
> 
> > Haven't you heard of "Physics Rex"? hehehehe
> >
> > In a message dated 9/25/06 8:51:38 PM, rs@silvergrain.org writes:
> >
> >
> >> What I got from it is that TK is bending a basic principle of  
> >> physics,
> >> and perhaps good exposure standard, so that he can call his process
> >> in-camera negative speed. I don't really follow his publications,  
> >> but it
> >> doesn't surprise me. What is more surprising is how it can be  
> >> published
> >> in BJP. Will you send a letter to the editor of BJP and other  
> >> places he
> >> published so that the editors and readers know the facts?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Wishes,
> > Mark Nelson
> >
> > Precision Digital Negatives - The System
> > PDNPrint Forum at Yahoo Groups
> > www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
> >
> >
>