Re: Contact versus In-camera Exposure Times
XTOL is nothing more than D 26 with salt.
S
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryuji Suzuki" <rs@silvergrain.org>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: Contact versus In-camera Exposure Times
And a parody of Kodak XTOL developer will be named Silvergrain REXTOL
(TM).
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:30:33 -0500, "Clay" <wcharmon@wt.net> said:
Stand by. My new 'Train Rex' process is almost complete.
On Sep 25, 2006, at 8:53 PM, Ender100@aol.com wrote:
> Haven't you heard of "Physics Rex"? hehehehe
>
> In a message dated 9/25/06 8:51:38 PM, rs@silvergrain.org writes:
>
>
>> What I got from it is that TK is bending a basic principle of
>> physics,
>> and perhaps good exposure standard, so that he can call his process
>> in-camera negative speed. I don't really follow his publications,
>> but it
>> doesn't surprise me. What is more surprising is how it can be
>> published
>> in BJP. Will you send a letter to the editor of BJP and other
>> places he
>> published so that the editors and readers know the facts?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Wishes,
> Mark Nelson
>
> Precision Digital Negatives - The System
> PDNPrint Forum at Yahoo Groups
> www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
>
>