RE: dig negs (Burkholder)
After a few off-list emails, I'd like to clarify something. I agree completely with Mark's post. Dan's book has some truely vital information, and it covers some important topics that aren't foung in the PDN manual. And if possible, go for both. However, for my work, I prefer the consistency and reliability of PDN to give me what I'm after, because I believe it's the best thing out there at this point in time. Camden Hardy camden[at]hardyphotography[dot]net http://www.hardyphotography.net On Sun, October 1, 2006 10:39 pm, Eric Neilsen wrote: > Perhaps this is a clear example of not seeing the forest for the trees. : > ) > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Camden Hardy [mailto:camden@hardyphotography.net] >> Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 11:18 PM >> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca >> Subject: Re: dig negs (Burkholder) > > > "> As artists, I would hope we can all think for ourselves. In shopping > for > a digital negative system, I'm looking for something to give me exactly > what > I want, not a means to "think for oneself". I can do that on my own." > > >
|