RE: dig negs (Burkholder)

[Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>]

Just for the record: My results were pretty consistent, reliable and
beatiful before reading Mark's book also. I mean you can get quite
consistent, reliable and beatiful results without PDN too - I don't quite
understand why PDN is presented as an absolute must for this purpose?

I agree with Mark; about getting/reading both books to learn as much as
possible...

Regards,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Camden Hardy [mailto:camden@hardyphotography.net] 
Sent: 02 Ekim 2006 Pazartesi 08:08
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: dig negs (Burkholder)

...

However, for my work, I prefer the consistency and reliability of PDN to
give me what I'm after, because I believe it's the best thing out there at
this point in time.

...