Re: dig negs (Burkholder)

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: dig negs (Burkholder)
From: Matthew Baily <info@creativefauna.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:15:39 -0400
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <49308.153.90.248.51.1160064624.squirrel@webmail.hardyphotography.net>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <20061003101532.5A60D2031FE@spamf2.usask.ca><F1F4AD13-C1FB-4D7C-B41D-B98FC942FB88@pacifier.com><Pine.NEB.4.64.0610042229170.21813@panix2.panix.com><076DB0AA-4F7C-4A1B-9037-25FD779A3064@pacifier.com><49308.153.90.248.51.1160064624.squirrel@webmail.hardyphotography.net>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

As much as I like the little arguments and blame games, is this not all rather relative. Both systems have their merits. We all have own preferences on technique. End of story?

Matt

References:
- RE: dig negs (Burkholder)
  - From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
- Re: dig negs (Burkholder)
  - From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>
- Re: dig negs (Burkholder)
  - From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
- Re: dig negs (Burkholder)
  - From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>
- Re: dig negs (Burkholder)
  - From: Camden Hardy <camden@hardyphotography.net>