Re: digital negative possibilities for gum

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: digital negative possibilities for gum
From: Carmen Lizardo <carmenlizardo@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;b=2AkWJ8iCbEhXg9NhKi1in5IppoxluyzpNtPynMePvImgbY3s2O39dZ44ORUbXxsekDS0qrhae01/Z8v6kMLDGUdbf1lW1aPnEz4OK1nBRarSP+hQKEse6ngsbeQ5JbNngOUEqGl1mKsyIOC2HcwqKIUaKZcALgh/s2DymJaBjo8= ;
In-reply-to: <022e01c6f244$e1607210$0201a8c0@testr7ec9d612n>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Chirs, very informative, great website! I've been
breaking my noodle trying to figure those spots in the
paper, and you pointed out that it is manufacturer
sizing irregularity. I guess I got a whole batch of
bad paper...but at least I know that I am not doing
something wrong.
Thanks for your generosity! 
Carmen




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

References:
- Re: digital negative possibilities for gum
  - From: Catherine Rogers <crogers@optusnet.com.au>