RE: Mike Ware's POP Pt./Pd. Pt
I think you recover some of the time you loose in exposure by skipping the development stage with an AFO-POP process though... Best regards, Loris. -----Original Message----- From: Sandy King [mailto:sanking@clemson.edu] Sent: 09 Kasım 2006 Perşembe 03:36 To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca Subject: Re: Mike Ware's POP Pt./Pd. Pt One caveat I should have mentioned is printing speed. In my initial tests I am finding a loss of about two stops with FAO and Ammonium Tetrachloropalladate (II) compared to FO and sodium palladium chloride. With the latter I can print a digital negative on Pictorico in about 100 units/seconds, while with the POP process the same negative needs about 400 units/seconds. Hopefully I will find some way to change this scenario, because there clearly seem to be some advantages with the use of FAO. Sandy
|