RE: Mike Ware's POP Pt./Pd. Pt
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: RE: Mike Ware's POP Pt./Pd. Pt
- From: EJN Photo <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:31:14 -0600
- Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net;h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE:In-reply-to;b=WbUQAn3YmQtj1kAtTNSOPASdmSygqjr+IcPDlJMl5dIvV9FXmzGew1x2uy5cJwPFRWqv0MLk2tuGn62tFGOd6V7jxZ4tkhNkanhktLd45nks10ghkBVTf3QPtzkKtR7hVRI0CZoHR/vlGf4D4rzAM7ltqJx4VQDyss9b2Zomd9I= ;
- In-reply-to: <455351FD.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <email@example.com>
- Reply-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Thread-index: AccEGez8bJOvnM0GS0SraGJfRX97VgAIt28g
Jordan, If you read Ware's papers and what is on his site, and compare them
to the package POP process of B&S called the Ziatype, you will soon see that
the basics are the same. Use AFO, humidify the paper, expose and process.
The cost of platinum and palladium are the same no matter which you choose.
You can use EDTA di and tetra sodium in all; Ware/Malde, Zia, and
traditional. Paper cost is the same.
AFO might work out to be a little cheaper; partly because it last longer
than FO. AFO is not very compatible with FOAM brushes so it makes good sense
to use rods and or bristle brushes like the "magic" brush.
Don't confuse an in depth science paper with a marketing manual, and you can
use any AFO system with ease.
Eric Neilsen Photography
4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9
Dallas, TX 75226
Skype : ejprinter> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jordan Wosnick [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 10:06 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Mike Ware's POP Pt./Pd. Pt
> For someone beginning Pt/Pd printing (but with experience doing
> Vandykes and cyanotypes), would you all recommend the Mike Ware
> (ammonium ferrioxalate) method or the "traditional" (ferric
> method? Is Ware's method cheaper than the "traditional" method?
> Loris Medici wrote:
> > And I'd say we should thank Mike Ware, Pradip Malde, Dick
> Sullivan and
> > Carl Weese (and other persons involved - not forgetting the
> > pioneers) for their efforts in devising workable, beatiful
> methods of
> > POP Pt/Pd printing using AFO sensitizer and sharing the
> > freely without any commercial intention.
> > Thank you! (Bowing)
> > Best regards,
> > Loris.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sandy King [mailto:email@example.com]
> > Sent: 09 Kasım 2006 Perşembe 03:22
> > To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Subject: Mike Ware's POP Pt./Pd. Pt
> > ...
> > In any event, I thank Loris Medici for putting me on the
> > advantages of FAO. Lots of potential here I believe.
> > ...
> Jordan Wosnick