RE: Mike Ware's POP Pt./Pd. Pt

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: Mike Ware's POP Pt./Pd. Pt
From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:56:31 +0200
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <007501c70446$50251da0$ffe5ea46@D6RJ5R41>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

I agree (that probably something's happening to the paper fibers not to
the noble metal itself)... I only use Citric Acid and Sodium Sulfite +
Na4 EDTA to clear my prints - usually just Citric Acid. I include
Sulfite + Na4 EDTA into the process only when I'm using FO sensitizer
and / or when the sensitizer contains KAuCl4 - because a stain will
remain otherwise.

Regards,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: EJN Photo [mailto:ejnphoto@sbcglobal.net] 
Sent: 09 Kasım 2006 Perşembe 23:31
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: Mike Ware's POP Pt./Pd. Pt

Loris, It could be that if only di sodium is being used that the buffers
in the paper are being used up and the paper is losing some strength. I
follow Di Sodium baths with tetra sodium; with both my FO, AFO, PT/PD as
well as with Chrysotypes.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Mike Ware's POP Pt./Pd. Pt
  - From: Sandy King <sanking@clemson.edu>

References:
- RE: Mike Ware's POP Pt./Pd. Pt
  - From: EJN Photo <ejnphoto@sbcglobal.net>