U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | RE: "New" Paper for Pt/Pd (and other iron processes, too)

RE: "New" Paper for Pt/Pd (and other iron processes, too)

Thanks Sandy,

I'm sure you'll share your experience & views regarding both Ware-Malde
(NH4) and Zia (Li) systems in a detailed manner (as you always do) -
thanks in advance! (What exactly you find "hard to beat" in the DOP


-----Original Message-----
From: Sandy King [mailto:sanking@clemson.edu] 
Sent: 29 Kasım 2006 Çarşamba 08:37
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: "New" Paper for Pt/Pd (and other iron processes, too)

Hi Loris,

Yes, it is from a digital negative. The original 
was a 7X17" in-camera negative.

The image file, at least on my monitor, shows 
more contrast than the actual print. The file was 
also greatly reduced in resolution for uploading 
to the LF site.

This is a DOP palladium print. I am going to do 
it again with the Ware/Malde and Ziatype POP to 
compare look. But it will be hard to beat the DOP 
print. But I am  getting great Dmax with the 
lithium palladium salt so we shall see.


At 8:14 AM +0200 11/29/06, Loris Medici wrote:
>The print looks nice! Is it from a digital negative? If that's not 
>asking too much, can you please provide a crop of the print (showing 
>tonality from shadows to the highlights) at 360dpi resolution 100% size

>(to let us see the paper texture)? A last question about the print: is 
>it DOP or POP?