RE: "New" Paper for Pt/Pd (and other iron processes, too)
Thanks Sandy, I'm sure you'll share your experience & views regarding both Ware-Malde (NH4) and Zia (Li) systems in a detailed manner (as you always do) - thanks in advance! (What exactly you find "hard to beat" in the DOP route?) Regards, Loris. -----Original Message----- From: Sandy King [mailto:sanking@clemson.edu] Sent: 29 Kasım 2006 Çarşamba 08:37 To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca Subject: RE: "New" Paper for Pt/Pd (and other iron processes, too) Hi Loris, Yes, it is from a digital negative. The original was a 7X17" in-camera negative. The image file, at least on my monitor, shows more contrast than the actual print. The file was also greatly reduced in resolution for uploading to the LF site. This is a DOP palladium print. I am going to do it again with the Ware/Malde and Ziatype POP to compare look. But it will be hard to beat the DOP print. But I am getting great Dmax with the lithium palladium salt so we shall see. Sandy At 8:14 AM +0200 11/29/06, Loris Medici wrote: >The print looks nice! Is it from a digital negative? If that's not >asking too much, can you please provide a crop of the print (showing >tonality from shadows to the highlights) at 360dpi resolution 100% size >(to let us see the paper texture)? A last question about the print: is >it DOP or POP?
|