U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: PYROCAT-MC GLYCOL: Alternative Process Film Development

Re: PYROCAT-MC GLYCOL: Alternative Process Film Development

  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: Re: PYROCAT-MC GLYCOL: Alternative Process Film Development
  • From: Jeremy Moore <jeremydmoore@gmail.com>
  • Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:56:10 -0600
  • Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;b=FoF1WCN3BLWUy5GQdZwFb5gV0b4jnTbJN5YkS84koIpPtHRxoQrHhu+GGYb+QJA6heSDNc2heER0YrwtWkalexn17khdFugtokanPF6pjrYG7R+bNYVi8bJlUL+nr0cOKiMEwbm150X5b2eutdCy0oPP9hRiheEsObBVtA/dFng=
  • In-reply-to: <a0602041fc1938903d5c5@>
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • References: <E784A748-C4D5-4038-8399-D37BFE3BBE4F@mac.com><a0602041fc1938903d5c5@>
  • Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca


What about the -P concotion? I thought it was to give higher apparent
sharpness (at the cost of larger grain) when using intermittent
agitation (such as tray processessing)


On 11/29/06, Sandy King <sanking@clemson.edu> wrote:

Results from the two formulas are similar, and you can basically use
the same times with -MC as with -HD. The most fundamental difference
is that you will get  greater apparent sharpness with -MC in rotary
(continuous) processing than with -HD, and if developing for the high
contrast needed for alternative printing there will be slightly less
B+F stain with -MC. The color of the stain is also slightly different
with -MC, but so far as I can tell this not change results very much.

In essence, if you want to do rotary processing I recommend -MC. For
minimal and stand development I recommend -HD. For other intermittent
types of agitation I recommend both.



At 10:44 AM -0800 11/29/06, Mark Booth wrote:
>I noticed that Sandy King is offering his new formula(s) of both
>Pyrocat-MC Glycol and Pyrocat-HD Glycol through Photographers'
>Formulary.  I am interested in their staining properties contrasted
>to pyro for alternative printing.
>What are the primary differences between the two formulas?  (Speed;
>Compensation/Expansion; Sharpness; Etc)  When would one formula have
>preference over the other developer variant or are each very similar?
>I find the organic solvent approach very intriguing and practical
>for consideration.  I primarily work with HP5 Plus; Bergger BPF 200;
>Acros 100; films.  Most frequently use the Farber's shared,
>Pyro-triethanolamine formula.
>Thank you,