Re: Karen mail
It'a odd that while you chose to play the white man to the cause of all the trouble, you appear to show little sympathy towards those who are the victims of this bit of crass stupidity. If an individual chooses to use an email service that includes the ability to generate automatic out of office replies, I would expect that person to have the intellegence to learn how to use it properly. Not sexually biased are you? Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Camden Hardy" <camden@hardyphotography.net> To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 4:08 AM Subject: Re: Karen mail ---Perhaps in return for Karen's thoughfulness, each member of the llist (I believe there are about 600) could each send her 100 "Thanks Yous". Thus she will receive 60,000 messages. Don't forget to add "Happy New Year!" ;-)That's a little passive-aggressive, don't you think? So she made a mistake and didn't set her auto-responder correctly. She is, after all, only human (as far as I know, at least). Can we please move on now? Now that I've finally gotten my inbox cleaned out from Karen's messages, it's now flooded with complaints about Karen's messages. Those of you playing the inconsiderate card, think about what your complaints are doing to everyone's inbox. Camden Hardy camden[at]hardyphotography[dot]net http://www.hardyphotography.net --- [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are currently using to read this email. ] [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are currently using to read this email. ]
|