U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | RE: Lithium palladium vs. "normal" palladium

RE: Lithium palladium vs. "normal" palladium


  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: RE: Lithium palladium vs. "normal" palladium
  • From: EJN Photo <ejnphoto@sbcglobal.net>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:51:55 -0600
  • Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net;h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE:In-reply-to;b=yAuxZQR1WZW75E5Mvc1d7x4eRYCxnDFa5uXngeZXxqnRvikGgdI/AcsmpUlTHneoCoW0pbnWCjyB0y2GN32DtVHU+y+WzUWU5kBisSSbksSoYFXaKuz5G0DImFxvRMyxENH0BzFdaOxYy4nHdSOXh1hVpcBSbh6qOX/KxRzBKTM= ;
  • In-reply-to: <54004.153.90.248.51.1169141152.squirrel@webmail.hardyphotography.net>
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Thread-index: Acc7Jc4KMxBSUSUYT+2sQpx571UN/wAC6LZA

Indeed, but the point is to figure out what is the weight really made up as
within the FO powder? This is why you run some exposure test, with solution
and prove it to your self. Good luck

Eric

Eric Neilsen Photography
4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9
Dallas, TX 75226
214-827-8301
http://ericneilsenphotography.com
 
Skype : ejprinter


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Camden Hardy [mailto:camden@hardyphotography.net]
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 11:26 AM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> Subject: RE: Lithium palladium vs. "normal" palladium
> 
> Loris,
> 
> > Let me remind you that the sample calculation I did for you
> was for
> > 60% AFO sensitizer. The norm is to use around 40-45%.
> Therefore the
> > amnt. of corresponding Li2[PdCl4] solution will increase if
> you use
> > 45% AFO instead of 60%.
> 
> I did pick up on that, but thanks for clarifying.  Seeing
> numbers helped
> me understand the theory behind the calculations, so I think
> (hope) I'll
> be able to figure it out on my own regardless of the chemistry
> I use.
> 
> 
> One more question.  If I were to use FO instead of AFO, is the
> molar ratio
> of FO to pd double salt 2:1?
> 
> 
> Camden Hardy
> 
> camden[at]hardyphotography[dot]net
> http://www.hardyphotography.net