RE: Lithium palladium vs. "normal" palladium
Indeed, but the point is to figure out what is the weight really made up as within the FO powder? This is why you run some exposure test, with solution and prove it to your self. Good luck Eric Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 214-827-8301 http://ericneilsenphotography.com Skype : ejprinter > -----Original Message----- > From: Camden Hardy [mailto:camden@hardyphotography.net] > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 11:26 AM > To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca > Subject: RE: Lithium palladium vs. "normal" palladium > > Loris, > > > Let me remind you that the sample calculation I did for you > was for > > 60% AFO sensitizer. The norm is to use around 40-45%. > Therefore the > > amnt. of corresponding Li2[PdCl4] solution will increase if > you use > > 45% AFO instead of 60%. > > I did pick up on that, but thanks for clarifying. Seeing > numbers helped > me understand the theory behind the calculations, so I think > (hope) I'll > be able to figure it out on my own regardless of the chemistry > I use. > > > One more question. If I were to use FO instead of AFO, is the > molar ratio > of FO to pd double salt 2:1? > > > Camden Hardy > > camden[at]hardyphotography[dot]net > http://www.hardyphotography.net
|