RE: Lithium palladium vs. normal palladium
This what is this list for. Even you don't use the same procedures as others (and still have no problems), it's always good to know different ones - to add them to the arsenal, in case you may need to try them (in a moment of desperation) in the future. Thanks for sharing info (that goes to all)! Regards, Loris. Quoting Witho Worms <info@witho.nl>: That is one of my reasons for a double coat Mark. If I have a to make a large print I turn the paper 180 degrees after the fist coat to even out my un evenness in the second one. Witho _____ Van: Ender100@aol.com [mailto:Ender100@aol.com] Verzonden: donderdag 18 januari 2007 22:04 Aan: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca Onderwerp: Re: Lithium palladium vs. normal palladium Hi Loris, With the Richeson Brush, I like to use just a little extra sensitizer, so that it gives me enough time to work the surface of the paper to get a nice even coat. I suppose, this also puts a little more PD on the surface, as the moisture evaporates off. Mark In a message dated 1/18/07 2:49:51 PM, mail@loris.medici.name writes: Hi Mark, I use both. 0.15ml (per 10 square inches) with glass rod, 0.2ml with the brush (DaVinci brand, pretty good brush for those who can't obtain a Richeson - at a fair price). Sometimes I use 0.2ml with the glass rod when the RH is too low (since this is a POP process you need a fair amount of water in the paper - yes, I can add a little distilled water instead but I'm lazy and the cost difference is not important). Regards, Loris.
|