U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | RE: Lithium palladium vs. normal palladium

RE: Lithium palladium vs. normal palladium



That is one of my reasons for a double coat Mark. If I have a to make a large print I turn the paper 180 degrees after the fist coat to even out my un evenness in the second one.

 

Witho

 


Van: Ender100@aol.com [mailto:Ender100@aol.com]
Verzonden: donderdag 18 januari 2007 22:04
Aan: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Onderwerp: Re: Lithium palladium vs. normal palladium

 

Hi Loris,

With the Richeson Brush, I like to use just a little extra sensitizer, so that it gives me enough time to work the surface of the paper to get a nice even coat.  I suppose, this also puts a little more PD on the surface, as the moisture evaporates off.

Mark
In a message dated 1/18/07 2:49:51 PM, mail@loris.medici.name writes:



Hi Mark,

I use both. 0.15ml (per 10 square inches) with glass rod, 0.2ml with 
the brush (DaVinci brand, pretty good brush for those who can't obtain 
a Richeson - at a fair price). Sometimes I use 0.2ml with the glass 
rod when the RH is too low (since this is a POP process you need a 
fair amount of water in the paper - yes, I can add a little distilled 
water instead but I'm lazy and the cost difference is not important).

Regards,
Loris.







Best Wishes,
Mark Nelson

Precision Digital Negatives - The System
PDNPrint Forum at Yahoo Groups
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com