U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | RE: Fujifilm to take back "discontinuation" of Single 8 films

RE: Fujifilm to take back "discontinuation" of Single 8 films



 
Is there any way I can receive messages from the group? The last ones I received were on 12/22. Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryuji Suzuki [mailto:rs@silvergrain.org] 
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 7:20 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca; pure@pure-silver.org
Subject: Fujifilm to take back "discontinuation" of Single 8 films

Fujifilm previously announced discontinuation of Fujichrome R25N and Fujichrome RT200N in March 2007, and
discontinuation of processing services in September 2008. However, in response to strong requests from a
Japanese 8mm user group, as of 10 January 2007, they took back that announcement and "deferred"
the future discontinuation dates. They estimate a 5-year extension for R25N and 3 years for RT200N. They also
request that the users understand the price must increase at this point, since they will have to make new
investment in manufacturing and processing equipment for products whose market rapidly shrunk in last years.

Based on their published amount of sales and nominal prices, the total *sales* of 8mm films and processing
service is about $250k annually, and they can apparently repair their old equipment to continue this business
for a few years based on this level of sales.

Official announcement (in Japanese):
http://fujifilm.jp/information/20070110/

Detailed response by Fuji to the 8mm user group (in Japanese) http://mistral-japan.co.jp/fuji_070110.pdf

The user group (http://filmmover.exblog.jp/) sent in two requests for continued services. In the requests,
they also requested to maintain the current pricing and even extending product range by offering reversal
films and motion picture negative films in 8mm size. One request was regarding designing and offering for sale
a new 8mm camera. Many of these requests are commercially not viable, of course, but Fuji's response at least
contained their good thoughts about the possibility of packaging existing reversal films in 8mm format after
production of dedicated 8mm films becomes inviable.