RE: Thanks, I think --Re: "Raw" for dummies ?

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: Thanks, I think --Re: "Raw" for dummies ?
From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:15:33 +0200
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <c19.10d17ead.330da344@aol.com>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Actually it's: "Expose for the shadows and develop for the highlights".
At least that's what I do since I started B&W photography...

Of course - alternatively - I may have missed some kind of humor ->
sorry if that is the case...

Regards,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Argon3@aol.com [mailto:Argon3@aol.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 3:30 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Thanks, I think --Re: "Raw" for dummies ?


...doesn't the old adage "expose for the highlights, develop for the
shadows" still have some truth even in this age of modern science
miracle cameras?...

References:
- Re: Thanks, I think --Re: "Raw" for dummies ?
  - From: Argon3@aol.com