RE: Thanks, I think --Re: "Raw" for dummies ?

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: Thanks, I think --Re: "Raw" for dummies ?
From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:23:02 +0200
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <003001c755c1$e5c090c0$0100a8c0@NEWDELL>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Hi Eric, what kind of recovery was that? I guess it wasn't something
that can't be done w/o Lightroom (because in the first place, you can't
recover something that it is not here...) but that particular program
simplifies and speeds up the proccess... Right? BTW, I liked the
cataloguing / archiving and batch RAW processing features of the program
very much.

Regards,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Neilsen [mailto:ejnphoto@sbcglobal.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 4:09 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: Thanks, I think --Re: "Raw" for dummies ?


I didn't read all the raw thread, but Lightroom even allows for some
recovery of JPEGs in the development. I was able to save a customers
image by processing a jpeg in Lightroom and made one darn nice print.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Thanks, I think --Re: "Raw" for dummies ?
  - From: EJN Photo <ejnphoto@sbcglobal.net>

References:
- RE: Thanks, I think --Re: "Raw" for dummies ?
  - From: Eric Neilsen <ejnphoto@sbcglobal.net>