Hi Mark,
So you (or anyone else) happen to know the density of all inks
on the 4800?
Camden Hardy
camden[at]hardyphotography[dot]net
http://www.hardyphotography.net
From: Ender100@aol.com
[mailto:Ender100@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 11:40 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Epson 3800 vs 4800 - any advice?
Camden,
The 2200 and the X600 series large format printers used the inital Ultrachrome
inkset—the black ink is indeed very dense to UV.... slightly over Log 4.0.....
just about like Kodalith!
Best Wishes,
Mark Nelson
Precision Digital Negatives -
The System
PDNPrint Forum at Yahoo Groups
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
In a message dated 2/28/07 10:54:20 AM, camden@hardyphotography.net writes:
In terms of black ink only, the 2200 is the best I've seen, and
you may
not find a printer that can stand up to the 2200 (can anyone confirm/deny
this?). Based on what I've seen and heard, the 2200 is one of the best
out there for black ink.
**************************************
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL
at http://www.aol.com.