----- Original Message ----- 
  
  
  Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 9:53 
  PM
  Subject: Re: venetian blinds, Epson 1280 
  and other printers
  
I'm just about through getting a 7800 calibrated using the 
  Imageprint RIP.  It is a bit premature to claim victory, but early 
  indications are showing the following benefits:
  
  1) the dithering pattern, when examined with a loupe, is both finer and 
  smoother, and to my eye, sharper than that generated by the Epson 
  driver. 
  2) highlights are beautiful - subtle in a way I have only heretofore seen 
  with in-camera negatives.
  3) The prepackaged profiles for Pictorico make it possible to print a 
  decent palladium negative by simply inverting the file and printing 
  it!!!!
  4) Fine tuning the output takes a very small correction curve, if you 
  even care to bother. 
  5) RGB space is the way to go, along with some subtle colorization.
  6) The RIP takes full 16 bit input. So you can stay in 16 bit mode 
  through the whole process, including the printing step.
  7) Using roll media, you can tile many negatives on a single print job 
  and save a lot of wasted pictorico.
  
  Weird things about the 7800:
  
  The straight-ahead PDN system does some extremely strange things when you 
  use the standard Epson driver and colorize the negative. For instance, the 
  spectral tests I ran indicated that a Red 200, Green 25 blend would be ideal 
  for palladium. Using the PDN test tablet, here are the UV densities for the 
  first couple of highlight steps:
  
  Step 100:  2.03 logD UV
  Step 93:  2.07
  Step 91: 2.6 !!
  Step 90: 2.85!!
  Step 89: 3.17
  Step 88: 3.24
  Step 87: 3.52!!
  Step 85: 2.93
  Step 84: 2.68
  
  Now this is just plain weird. 
  
  Visually, the steps appear to be getting less dense as you move down to 
  lower step numbers. But my UV densitometer tells another tale. And I confirmed 
  this by printing the negative again AND deliberately overprinting the step 
  tablet by a stop  to see if I could even get any tone in those strange 
  steps in the middle. It tells the same story. So a correction curve using this 
  PDN color would be very difficult if not impossible to make with these density 
  reversals in a gradated step wedge what in theory is the same 
tone. 
  
  More later.
  
  Clay
  
  
  
  
  
  Hi Don,
You can use a RIP 
    with PDN—though once I noticed a strange repeating pattern in a print made 
    from a negative off a RIP.  As you mentioned, there seems to be no free 
    lunch.  It is a matter of finding a combination with the least 
    problems.  Though I must say, other than the Venetian Blinds, which I 
    solved by getting an R1800, I have very little problem making good 
    negatives.
Mark
In a message dated 3/3/07 7:10:10 PM, dsbryant@bellsouth.net 
    writes:
    
Thanks Mark. Seems like there is no free lunch with ink 
      jet printers, we are always chasing one problem or another. I wonder if a 
      RIP could solve some of the ink density problems. I think Clay Harmon is 
      working with IJC/OPM and the 7800. Could a RIP be used with PDN 
      ?
 
Don
Best Wishes,
Mark 
    Nelson
Precision Digital Negatives 
    - The System
PDNPrint Forum at Yahoo 
    Groups
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
**************************************
AOL 
    now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL 
    at http://www.aol.com.