Re: A question of using other peoples' photos
Hi Katharine,
Thanks for that. I am thinking of
printing these things as a personal project. Much the same idea as you. The
images are so appealing to me and I want so much to work with them,
but not at the cost of my immortal soul! Maybe, like you, I may fall out
with the idea so maybe a period of maturation is in order.
Thanks
again,
David H
PS I see you're updating your site.
Always worth a visit.
On Mar 6 2007,
Katharine Thayer wrote:
Hi David,
This copyright
discussion has been interesting to me, and as you
suggest, it has at
least two parts to it: (1) the copyright issue,
and (2) how to
represent the fact that they are someone else's
photos. Your
thought below, following the Westons, seems fine. And
there's a
third issue that you allude to below; aside from the legal
and
representation issues, there's the moral issue of printing
someone else's work in a different medium without being able to ask
if that's okay with them.
Years ago, I bought a
photograph album in a flea market that
intrigued me quite a lot,
full of wonderful photos of a family, some
looking like professional
photos and some like snapshots. All
together it gave a remarkable
impression of an extended American
family of a certain social class
during the First World War. The
pictures are mostly women; the men
were apparently gone to war and
are represented only by a couple of
pictures of men in military
uniforms at military camps. The women
are pictured laughing and
playing guitars and pianos and driving
cars and thoroughly enjoying
themselves, all dressed up in these
great outfits with ostrich-
feathered hats and the like.
There was a time when I thought about using the pictures somehow, but
I never came up with a project that appeals to me. It's not
really
my kind of work anyway, it's more the kind of thing one
might do for
an academic student project. But if I ever did a body
of work
around this, it would be presented up front as found photos;
that
would be the organizing principle of the work, that I found
these
intriguing photographs, so there shouldn't be any question
that the
photos weren't mine.
I would think the
fact that your originals were vintage lantern
slides might be
interesting to someone, so you might even capitalize
on the fact.
You could present one or two of the slides (not for
sale, but just
alongside) for interest.
I did use some of the pictures from
this album to make negatives to
practice gum printing with, before I
was set up with a darkroom.
This was in the old, old days, before
there were desktop scanners, so
I made the negatives by taking the
album to a copy shop and
photocopying the prints (reversed) onto
transparencies. I put one of
these practice prints on my website, as
an example of a print made
from a photocopy negative:
http://www.pacifier.com/~kthayer/html/hat.html
Katharine
On Mar 6, 2007, at 8:02 AM,
davidhatton@totalise.co.uk wrote:
>
Thanks
for your replies guys and gals.
I was > concerned about the
morality of printing someone elses work
in a > different format
without being able to ask permission. I
thought > it might be
nice to present these images in a contemporary
medium > with a
modern approach. Under no circumstances would I pass
off >
original work as my own. I have a couple of Weston prints. On
the
> reverse is a stamp ' Photograph by Edward Weston (date), Print
by > Cole Weston (date)'. I was thinking of something along those
lines.
>
Thanks again for your replies
David
H