Re: negative scanners (OT)
- To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
- Subject: Re: negative scanners (OT)
- From: SusanV <susanvoss3@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 18:00:17 -0400
- Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta;h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;b=knSgFu6pJlrlnHKHjL3XUMxcpDuTp7DsJ8/6xhP7ku46E2hBEN2cFqnoA3W89tJS2OYvSFqNdycxW/gzCpyfL2x0Im138+CKX9iFu1M0OVy/5ScnlUqouwuKtamAq5oTsG+gPwwl19CPmjIQxCk7Hy2qcGnLARvgsk0YYlfV1VU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;b=iwD381w28acUl9lA6mJvdWOMKNUhKSKc8A6PjrnSXyIBy6Xm4GXGaMyzk8nV+l3wZsFfEfMnOcyPoxGnJsmtiVP5KElHLUIcL8Xc63B0iQIicV8v+fzm20hk4xuwWq/cD3+BIHH6cAlIFBUvamM41rOGW0fMGCM+WVV9RngwLZo=
- In-reply-to: <9527a22e0706301355r6ad52ea2qe26a3d2bf6b442a@mail.gmail.com>
- List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
- References: <20070627.180916.245164009.lifebook-4234377@silvergrain.org><9527a22e0706271654u2d939a41vd68686c0cc3adb11@mail.gmail.com><a0602040cc2a8e1ac5291@192.168.1.101><20070628.003827.04335073.lifebook-4234377@silvergrain.org><a0602040dc2a8ef03d8c0@192.168.1.101><2de1e7ed0706300734p16fc2a1dq2572c164634ff5fc@mail.gmail.com><9527a22e0706301355r6ad52ea2qe26a3d2bf6b442a@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Haha... Hey Eric. I felt the same way when I read it! So darned
easy. I do wish I could give credit for the person who shared the
idea, but I can't remember, darnit.
eat your vegetables,
Susan
On 6/30/07, eric nelson <emanphoto@gmail.com> wrote:
Your tip just gave me a V8 moment!
Thanks.
Eric
On 6/30/07, SusanV <susanvoss3@gmail.com> wrote:
> Regarding "best plane of focus"... I read somewhere an easy way of
> finding this on a flatbed. Using a stack of business cards or
> something similar, fan them out a bit so that each card edge extends
> past the others in the stack, then place this on the scanner bed and
> scan. Note the card edge with the sharpest image. In my case it was
> the third card... so the focusing distance is 3 cards high. Happily
> for me, that also happens to be exactly where my Epson stock negative
> holder places the neg.
>
> susan
>
> gravure blog at www.susanvossgravures.blogspot.com
>
>
>
> On 6/28/07, Sandy King <sanking@clemson.edu> wrote:
> > For $60 you can buy a fluid mount kit for the Epson 4990, V700 or
> > V750. See http://www.betterscanning.com/scanning/mstation.html
> >
> > This mounting station provides for adjustment to plane of best focus,
> > and fluid mount on the under side of the mounting station. These two
> > features together will provide a significant increase in quality of
> > scan with the Epson flatbeds.
> >
> > Sandy King
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 12:38 AM -0400 6/28/07, Ryuji Suzuki wrote:
> > >
> > >In my comparison of V700 and Coolscan scanner (5000 and 9000),
> > >V700 delivers just as good resolution for 35mm
> > >format. However, 5000 scans faster. Another thing is that
> > >V700, like any scanner, is very sensitive to the glass-to-film
> > >distance, but Epson ships the scanner with flimsy plastic
> > >crap, which is usable, but requires some tests to get full
> > >potential performance.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> susan
> gravure blog at www.susanvossgravures.blogspot.com
>
--
susan
gravure blog at www.susanvossgravures.blogspot.com
website www.dalyvoss.com