Re: Work in the alt exhibit
Henk,
Your research sounds very intriging but I hope it doesnt clog up
the nozzles on your printer. What would you call this process? Something
different to Carbon Transfer, I presume.
Maybe, ''Inkjet Transfer''?
How's that Phillip?
Great stuff ! !
See you later inovator.
John - Photographist - London - UK
...........................................................................................
----- Original Message -----
From: "henk thijs" <henk.thijs@hetnet.nl>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Work in the alt exhibit
On 7 sep 2007, at 12:33, John Grocott wrote:
Don,
Of course, I agree with you, if you want to bandy words, but
you and I and anyone else including Phillip, knows the difference
between a traditional process involving the making of a gelatine image
and tranfering it by lengthy, wet means to a paper support, and the use
of a computer inkjet printer.
If you cannot see the difference that is OK. But, of course you can
see........
... be careful.... there are transfers from inkjet images, i am messing
around with it.
If you print on prepared polyester , prepared with acrylic gloss medium
and inkaid, you can transfer -pigment based- ink jet prints onto whatever
you want.
You could even made negs on polyester sheets prepared with inkaid ....
cheers,
Henk
What point are you trying to make? Mmmmmmmm??
Chin up.
As ever.
John- Photographist- London - UK.
......................................................................
....
----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Bryant" <dsbryant@bellsouth.net>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 2:03 AM
Subject: RE: Work in the alt exhibit
John,
Inkjet prints ARE NOT the Carbon Transfer process.
Hmmm, I thought the image was transferred from the computer to the
inkjet
print. And as you said inkjets are pure carbon. So doesn't that mean
that
Inkjet prints are indeed Carbon Transfer prints? Yes?
Don