U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Réf. : Re: Work in the alt exhibit

Réf. : Re: Work in the alt exhibit



''Inkjet Transfer'' for this process, i prefer
 
 
Philippe (Belgium)
-------Message original-------
 
Date : 09/07/07 17:09:20
Sujet : Re: Work in the alt exhibit
 
Henk,
          Your research sounds very intriging but I hope it doesnt clog up
the nozzles on your printer. What would you call this process?  Something
different to Carbon Transfer, I presume.
  Maybe, ''Inkjet Transfer''?
                      How's that Phillip?
Great stuff ! !
See you later inovator.
John - Photographist - London - UK
............................................................................................
----- Original Message -----
From: "henk thijs" <henk.thijs@hetnet.nl>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Work in the alt exhibit
 
 
>
> On 7 sep 2007, at 12:33, John Grocott wrote:
>
>> Don,
>>          Of course, I agree with you,  if you want to bandy words,  but
>> you and I and anyone else including Phillip, knows the  difference
>> between a traditional process involving the making of a  gelatine image
>> and tranfering it by lengthy, wet means to a paper  support, and the use
>> of a computer inkjet printer.
>> If you cannot see the difference that is OK. But, of course you can
>> see........
>
>
> ... be careful.... there are transfers from inkjet images, i am  messing
> around with it.
> If you print on prepared polyester , prepared with acrylic gloss  medium
> and inkaid, you can transfer -pigment based- ink jet prints  onto whatever
> you want.
> You could even made negs on polyester sheets prepared with inkaid ....
> cheers,
> Henk
>
>
>> What point are you trying to make? Mmmmmmmm??
>> Chin up.
>> As ever.
>> John- Photographist- London - UK.
>> ......................................................................
>> ....
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Bryant"  <dsbryant@bellsouth.net>
>> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 2:03 AM
>> Subject: RE: Work in the alt exhibit
>>
>>
>> John,
>>
>>> Inkjet prints ARE NOT the Carbon Transfer process.
>>
>> Hmmm, I thought the image was transferred from the computer to the
>> inkjet
>> print. And as you said inkjets are pure carbon. So doesn't that  mean
>> that
>> Inkjet prints are indeed Carbon Transfer prints? Yes?
>>
>> Don
>>
>>
>>
>
 
__________ Information NOD32 2512 (20070907) __________
 
Ce message a ete verifie par NOD32 Antivirus System.
 
 
Binettes GRATUITES pour vos courriels - par IncrediMail! Cliquez ici!