U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: Stonehenge Black

Re: Stonehenge Black

  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: Re: Stonehenge Black
  • From: Jeremy Moore <jeremydmoore@gmail.com>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:13:45 -0500
  • Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;s=beta;h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;bh=/6kbjhM9cG4bFWwZbW+QSj6qJ9gSm06uSple5ia8cn8=;b=iXFr32cxSxWdPwQb6Gf54OTEVw8AHqIfdQU229lCA+/H6yhcrO3Q4QFGmtcORSLZFYkjICaeD6nHK+GiKeFZQ8YEfCP1YYyZTBEbpRe7dfw96Ux6LEeH2KwPeIlT21cMtZonjVpjdwYjOaMjIhzLMS5Zrv7iqLEA/mgC3EH0c5Q=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;b=oN4M9zkZmOp/xRmW2aVgV398juM9WxvwQt2zpqSiUlJSsmJo3i7q6R1vYrLXCvGJlpj3oZM3FaWrSiFSR4uufacRtsvoS/B/JMzH2ZUKtQW0aizV/XmxJMXVCyrf1Ingj1tD+gwZS54coyWV8qPdBAYlPNwlVmYozRY7eBHd2nk=
  • In-reply-to: <200709251105.50861.gordon.holtslander@usask.ca>
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • References: <66575de70709241442y204bffc9ref68c3c1c7c1075c@mail.gmail.com><200709251105.50861.gordon.holtslander@usask.ca>
  • Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Gord, I'm just checking to see if anyone has tried printing on the black stonehenge before I place an order for 10-15 sheets. I'm thinking I shouldn't have any problems, though, as people have used white/natural stonehenge for printing w/ gum before, but wanted to check.


On 9/25/07, Gordon J. Holtslander <gordon.holtslander@usask.ca> wrote:
On September 24, 2007 3:42:08 pm Jeremy Moore wrote:
> I am looking for an archival black paper to print gum bichromate on and I
> was wondering if anyone has had experience with Stonehenge Black. I know
> that Stonehenge is currently up in the air regarding the future, but Daniel
> Smith has enough for the current project I'm working on and at $1.99/sheet
> ( http://www.danielsmith.com/products~cat~450~sku~215+360+001.asp ), it is
> much cheaper than Arches Hot Press at $3.69 (
> http://www.danielsmith.com/products~sku~285+540+008.asp).

I use a lot of Stonehenge -but know nothing about potential problems - can you
tell us more?


Gordon J. Holtslander           Dept. of Biology
gordon.holtslander@usask.ca     University of Saskatchewan
Tel 306 966-4433                112 Science Place
Fax 306 966-4461                Saskatoon SK., CANADA
homepage.usask.ca/~gjh289       S7N 5E2