Re: uncurve/curve comparison on Loris' website

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: uncurve/curve comparison on Loris' website
From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:18:12 +0300
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <20070928201147.yvn64d4fkscoc004@loris.medici.name>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <02e301c801ac$a646ce40$ce02500a@altinyildiz.boyner><3144BAEC-C0F8-4FA8-9D6B-842672D3012B@pacifier.com><20070928201147.yvn64d4fkscoc004@loris.medici.name>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3)

Sorry about "chopping" comment. I just realized that I clarified that issue in another message (addressed to Don)... Hope it's clear now.

Quoting Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>:

That comment (which you chopped the first part) wasn't related to
devise curves for gum printing (either tricolor or single layer). It
was an independent suggestion (there was two different subjects /
issues in that message) about how to get paper white with R1800 inks
when using colorized (= no black) negatives (with whatever process -
you name - that one is able to change coating solution's ES)...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: uncurve/curve comparison on Loris' website
  - From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>

References:
- RE: uncurve/curve comparison on Loris' website
  - From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
- Re: uncurve/curve comparison on Loris' website
  - From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>
- Re: uncurve/curve comparison on Loris' website
  - From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>