RE: the grammar of spam

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: the grammar of spam
From: Dave Soemarko <fotodave@dsoemarko.us>
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:23:43 -0400
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.64.0710061422300.13681@panix1.panix.com>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <C32D5D2E.1C6D8%maelduin@ozemail.com.au><Pine.NEB.4.64.0710061422300.13681@panix1.panix.com>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Thread-index: AcgISrSQcA6mwY85QwC8Uw2Ghal5aAAC/pew

> I have been mocked (or praised?) on this very list as 
> grammarian, (or maybe it was "goddess of between you and 
> me"?), but I share this off-topic topic as not entirely frivolous....

I have enjoyed the grammar stuffs a lot.   :-)


Dave S

References:
- things that bite photographers
  - From: Ross Chambers <maelduin@ozemail.com.au>
- the grammar of spam
  - From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>

go to date index
go to thread index