RE: Jim Patterson's cyanotype for you cyano techies
Please read as: "... I doubt it is fast enough ..." I guess what I wrote before was contrary to what I actually ment... Regards, Loris. -----Original Message----- From: Loris Medici [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 10:24 AM To: email@example.com Subject: Re: Jim Patterson's cyanotype for you cyano techies Mike Ware's version of Rex!? What's that? :) BTW, I haven't tried Jim Patterson's version yet (and probably won't try it in the near future) but I suspect it is fast enough for in-camera exposure, since It uses the same sensitizer with TK's Rex formula + see this: http://www.usask.ca/lists/alt-photo-process-l/200609/msg00420.html Regards, Loris. Quoting "Christina Z. Anderson" <firstname.lastname@example.org>: > ... > > Don't know how it compares to Mike > Ware's version of Rex, either. I am more tempted to try the cuprotype > for the interesting color at this moment.