Re: dpi for digital negatives
- To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
- Subject: Re: dpi for digital negatives
- From: SusanV <susanvoss3@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:06:16 -0500
- Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;s=beta;h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;bh=Nf0bEpcHp1QAq48GGBkUidKrz5ndpiBAqbd4mtUubvo=;b=HbIeL8PEY7+/GymT8vm7XSVmuuwtsC7EQ+lSzL3FUMepBdBk+c2JF749fj7Tl6lhWuyNNbsqLtXszGBOy2wTyoE2suNYjVAO3L6viV6xy07hFfeO5s+ghRsg/ITFBuaYZ5fRr6Anot0INiHV599ChnOa4SYN6qfZZAFz+3VBm5A=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;b=r2/3mb5jX5CqBk8BOkhcggHMyE6C8lZHqiOaE3nuOfsWbGQ4jfkySZ2VcAI+0w020JFlN57JPgxLrY51K6H0b6xIMuj9szSgOWkcdQnwKhLkZrRKskf4RkvHobZR/ewX7iqNkZfLGarfOv9qJJGEuFjq00zzHDmkVC9WVqX4ooY=
- In-reply-to: <04C0F1D1-964D-4819-BA86-572BD9593397@sfai.edu>
- List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
- References: <c0e.19940ba6.3460815f@aol.com><04C0F1D1-964D-4819-BA86-572BD9593397@sfai.edu>
- Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Thanks, Jack, not as entertaining as Mark's reply, but a
tiny little bit more informative. I just googled that and found out that it simply means print resolution of 5760 x 1440.
Why couldn't they just say that?
(Hope your travels were happy, and welcome back.)
susan
On 11/5/07, jfulton <
jfulton@sfai.edu> wrote:Having been gone on travels since early June it is refreshing to return to Paradise, here where I live
and experience the ongoing providing of alt. photo info and Mark's consistent humor. About the only
thing I can add is that RPM means Resolution Performance Management and is proprietary acronym
used by Epson.
Jack
I think it stands for "Rotweilers Per Minute"
In a message dated 11/5/07 7:21:27 AM,
susanvoss3@gmail.com writes:
Hey Mark,
I was glad to hear you mention the "photo RPM" setting because I've been curious about it for a long time. Does anyone know what that stands for? With my 1280, that setting gives me the best results with my digital negs made for gravures.
I've had banding problems in the past, but solved them by using some and all the methods you described.
Susan
Best Wishes,
Mark Nelson
Precision Digital Negatives - The System
PDNPrint Forum at Yahoo Groups
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
**************************************
See what's new at
http://www.aol.com
--
susan
gravure blog at
www.susanvossgravures.blogspot.comwebsite
www.dalyvoss.com